Litotes in English research articles: disciplinary variation across life and social sciences
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
: metadiscourse in introduction sections of applied linguistics and physics research articles: exploring variation in frequency and type
abstract in written mode of language, metadiscourse markers are used commonly to help writers in general and academic writers in particular to produce coherent and professional texts. the purpose of the present study was to compare introduction sections of applied linguistics and physics articles regarding their use of interactive and interactional metadiscourse markers based on the model pro...
15 صفحه اولTracing Metadiscursive Stance over Time and Across Disciplines: A Comparative Study of English Research Articles
Research in academic writing has revealed a strong tendency on the part of writers to interactively communicate their scientific findings with their readers. In doing so, the writers should take a position while arguing their propositions. This interaction as proposed by Hyland (2005b) takes places having two sides of stance and engagement. This study targeted the stance component of writer-rea...
متن کاملcomparative analysis of the use of hedges & emphatics in english and persian academic research articles of sociology & psychology
چکیده ندارد.
15 صفحه اولSignposting Propositions: A Study of Interactive Metadiscourse Marking in the Composition of Research Articles Across Sciences
Writers ensure the expected (re)construction of concepts in the mind of the audience through effective signposting of the inevitably linear linguistic stream, which is a main aspect of metadiscourse called interactive metadiscourse. In this study, the use of interactive metadiscourse markers in research articles was investigated to examine any probable difference existing between different disc...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Linguistica Pragensia
سال: 2020
ISSN: 1805-9635
DOI: 10.14712/18059635.2020.1.3